Proposal to Adjust Parameters of TricryptoINV pool

Proposals
#1

Summary

Proposal to adjust pool parameters to TricryptoINV to match more closely to the currently deployed TriCRV pool.

Motivation

On advice from both the Curve core team and Curve Research, we would like the pool parameters of TricryptoINV to reflect the following in order to be more optimized:

  • EMA ½ time = remain unchanged at 30 mins
  • Fees = change mid_fee to 0.2% and out_fee to 0.45%
  • All other parameters should be adjusted to match TriCRV’s deployment

Specification

TricryptoINV pool: https://curve.fi/#/ethereum/pools/factory-tricrypto-3/deposit
TriCRV pool: https://curve.fi/#/ethereum/pools/factory-tricrypto-4/deposit

For

Adjust TricryptoINV pool parameters to create more optimized pool

Against

Do not change TricryptoINV pool parameters (do nothing)

2 Likes
#2

Curve DAO Vote: https://dao.curve.fi/vote/ownership/410

Convex Vote: Snapshot

#3

Update TricryptoINV parameters to match TriCRV. Vote: https://dao.curve.fi/vote/ownership/414
*This vote supercedes votes #482 and #486 (Ownership vote #410 and Parameter Vote #72)

1 Like
#4

After further consultation with the Curve Core Team and Curve Research, this proposal has been resubmitted in https://dao.curve.fi/vote/ownership/414 with the parameters of TricryptoINV being fully changed to match TriCRV (mid_fee, out_fee and EMA 1/2 time included).

Convex Vote: Snapshot

3 Likes
#5

A new proposal was submitted to adjust the ma_time since the adjustment is the exp time (1/e), so to get a ma_time of 600, 865 needs to be submitted for _new_ma_time

Vote up here: https://dao.curve.fi/vote/ownership/433
Convex vote: Snapshot